Office of the Inspector General – Miami‑Dade County
Felix Jimenez (Felix.Jimenez@miamidade.gov)
601 NW 1st Court
Transit Village South Tower
22nd Floor, Miami, FL 33136
Via email and USPS
7-30-25
Stan Fitzgerald – Victim
2701 Cheatham CT NW
Acworth, GA 30101
770-707-6291
RE: Officer of the Court / Attorney Allegedly Involved in the Mass Dissemination of Sealed Miami Court Records
Attorney: Alexander DeFilippo, Florida Bar No. 1002958
Alleged Co-Conspirators:
Angie Wong, elected GOP official in Miami
Debbie Dooley, Georgia political operative with a large bulk email distribution list
It has been proven (attached) that a restricted link to sealed or restricted Miami court transcripts—originating from Attorney Alexander DeFilippo—was accessed and utilized by his client, Angie Wong, via her alias social media account, @Agent_411, to publicly share sealed court records on an ongoing basis.
What is even more egregious is that Ms. Debbie Dooley, based in Georgia, appears to have used this attorney-sourced restricted access not only to post the link on her public social media account (which has approximately 28,000 followers), but also to disseminate the material via three bulk email blasts, leaking the sealed documents to approximately 30,000 recipients, including targeted political associates of Stan Fitzgerald on behalf of Wong and DeFilippoIn written communications, Ms. Dooley has confirmed that she is working with Attorney Alexander DeFilippo supplying him information. Dooley is not a licensed investigator, nor counsel, she is a political pundit.
On or about July 12, 2025 at 10:42:40 PM EDT, Debbie Dooley disseminated mass emails that included sealed court documents from a Florida family court case:
-
Case Name: Angie Wong v. Stan Fitzgerald
-
Filing ID: 222347279
-
Court Case No.: 2024-019469-FC-04 – SEALED
Two follow-up bulk mass emails were sent containing leaked information from:
Contempt Motion Angie Wong v. Stan Fitzgerald
2024-019469-FC-04 – sealed and appeal
Stan Fitzgerald v. Angie Wong and Appeal Case No.: 132024DR019469A00104 – Restricted
Cobb County, Georgia police report filed 7-24-25 Case No. 25-048057 and in the RMS (Records Management System) the documents are in evidence.
Ms. Wong is under investigation by the Virginia Department of Criminal Justice for alleged fraud on the court related to Appeal Case No.: 132024DR019469A00104 – Miami Judge Klukas.
VA case (2024-1001) reached adjudication on May 2, 2025, and I have been feeding information to the FBI.Attached are exhibits of proof.
I seek justice from your office and the privacy afforded by the seal of the court which has been criminally violated to mass dissemination.
Thank you,
Stan Fitzgerald
Florida law and bar rules analysis on this:
Attorney Alexander DeFilippo Now Legally Bound to Report Client Angie Wong’s alleged Criminal Misconduct
Conclusion (Lead-In):
Attorney Alexander DeFilippo (Florida Bar No. 1002958) is no longer shielded by attorney-client confidentiality and is now legally and ethically required to report the ALLEGED criminal conduct of his client, Angie Wong, to the appropriate authorities. The breach involves the public dissemination of sealed court records—records accessed through a confidential court transcript link originally issued to DeFilippo and subsequently leaked by Wong under the alias @Agent_411.
This action, further promoted by political operative Debbie Dooley, constitutes likely violations of Florida criminal statutes, contempt of court, and cyber-harassment. Under Florida law and the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, DeFilippo has crossed the threshold into mandatory reporting territory.
Why DeFilippo Is Now Legally Obligated to act
1. Client's Criminal Conduct Is Now Known
Angie Wong Alleged misused materials connected to DeFilippo’s legal representation to commit or further criminal activity—including leaking sealed records. Rule 4-1.6(b)(1) requires a lawyer to disclose information when necessary to prevent further criminal acts.
“A lawyer shall reveal such information to the extent the lawyer reasonably believes necessary to prevent a client from committing a crime.”
Key Point:
DeFilippo now knows his client allegedly misused a restricted court link. To avoid becoming complicit, he must report this to the Florida Bar, State Attorney, and Inspector General’s Office.
2. Prohibition on Assisting Fraud or Criminal Acts
Under Rule 4-1.2(d), a lawyer may not assist or remain silent when a client engages in alleged criminal or fraudulent conduct connected to the lawyer's legal work.
“A lawyer shall not counsel a client to engage, or assist a client, in conduct that the lawyer knows or reasonably should know is criminal or fraudulent.”
Key Point:
Whether or not DeFilippo was initially aware of Wong’s misuse, he is now legally accountable. Silence or inaction now may amount to knowing assistance or failure to prevent further harm. He must:
Withdraw from representation,
Notify the court, and
Report to the proper oversight agencies.
3. Mandatory Reporting of Known alleged Criminal Acts
Rule 4-8.3 makes clear that any lawyer with knowledge of criminal conduct involving dishonesty, untrustworthiness, or misconduct must report it.
“A lawyer who knows that a person has committed a criminal act that raises a substantial question as to that person’s honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects shall inform the appropriate professional authority.”
Key Point:
Wong’s allleged actions meet this threshold. DeFilippo must report her actions to avoid disciplinary action or professional culpability.
4. Violation of Florida Statutes – Sealed Court Records
Florida law, including § 843.0855, prohibits the unauthorized release or use of sealed or confidential judicial documents, especially for harassment or political gain.
Key Point:
Now that DeFilippo is aware of the breach, failure to act may be seen as a neglect of mandatory duty, possibly exposing him to:
Florida Bar disciplinary action
Criminal inquiry for concealment or negligence
